Content is the king. Really? I have reasons to doubt my earlier assertions. I was under the impression that content would drive the future growth of Broadband. Indeed, it was a general impression one could get from the media.
However, it hasn’t happened. Barring the mobiles, there hasn’t been much movement on the same. Even in mobile segment, the charges are usurious (in the garb of value added services). A company looking to expand it’s services in the rural areas cannot go alone with it all.
Hence, the voice sevices contribute to the bottom line majorly. Analyse any plan offering from the cross section of the operators and spot the difference. You would need to have an IQ of above 150, be a part of the famed MENSA group (I am neither) and perhaps better than the marketing department of the telecom companies.
Content clearly has failed to drive the volumes. I was looking forward to streaming video on a “better than dial up” broadband, which clearly disappoints (even in the best case scenario). However, the only thing that really works is the radio (more on that sometime later).
This post was influenced by a write up in Business Week. (Be warned of the flash/ blinking adverts/ pop ups and all the scum you associate with a badly designed website- admittedly the content is important; or use Opera’s famous content blocker).
The lead story mentions about the content ratio and the cost it takes to distribute bandwidth.
One megabit per second doesn’t sound like that much, but ISPs spread that bandwidth out over their subscribers. Analysts estimate that ISPs sell around 30 times more bandwidth to their end users than they can connect simultaneously to the Internet…..On the broadband network, the oversubscription means that one megabit-per-second connection to the Internet is enough to serve 40 DSL accounts, each at a maximum speed of 768 kilobits per second, typical for low-end DSL (The “extremely LOW END is what we have in India courtesy the idiots you know of). So the cost of providing data to each DSL is about 25 cents to 50 cents a month per customer.
BellSouth Corp.’s chief architect, Henry Kafka, uses the assumption that the cost of providing a month’s worth of data to the average user, about 2 gigabytes, costs the company $1. That’s a fairly small amount compared to the $25 to $47 a month BellSouth charges for DSL, but then the company has to pay for sales, support, maintenance and a host of other costs….But if the customer starts watching Internet TV like the average household watches regular TV, 8 hours a day, BellSouth’s cost would go up to $112 a month.
This assumes importance because BSNL is planning to get in IPTV/ server based movie downloads. So, you could start downloading a movie (typically 1.5 GB), make babies, rear them, send them to school and perhaps see them into adulthood and by that time the movie downloads would be “half finished”. Okay, this is an exaggeration, but you get the idea about sorry state of “broadband”.
A higher upload/download ratio would cripple their networks making it useless even for the Pakistanis to bomb in the event of war. Of course, Chinese would be eager to sell it again at the “lowest cost” and the media would be swooning and foaming at their mouths about the “Chinese Technology”.
Hence, we could only uncork the bubbly once the issues are settled for the backend and the last mile access. If VSNL stops pimping it’s network (which again was public infrastructure sold to private interests), it would make a lot of sense to end users like you and me. Perhaps a better file sharing experience? Or streaming videos of the latest blockbusters on your desktop/ TV?
Pricing the content again is a contentious issue. This hasn’t been settled so far. This explains the rationale behind Anil Ambani’s driven Broadband “Enterpise” (which is choked on it’s own vomit for the time being) to own content. He would leverage it across his cross holdings (DTH/ IPTV/ Mobiles) and earn fat commisions in the long run if he manages to sign up the famed “millions”.
(On a second thought, the bozos up there surely dream up the millions in a jiffy).
Content? We’d have to watch and I’d reserve my judgement for another day.
This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
Related posts:
- Content driving future growth It’s becoming increasingly clear that Reliance infocomm wants to straddle the telecom industry. Broadband rollout has been very slow- at...
- Broadband Blog:Modified content Ever since this was “ajaxified!”, I have been experimenting with the basic set up. Though, I must admit that my...
- Content Services Telecom “revolution” needs mobile phone instruments. It appears to be a lop sided growth because worldwide trends appear to be...
- Insanities offered by BSNL Broadband Insanities offered by BSNL Broadband BSNL has finally jumped in the broadband arena with a watered down offering. However, there...
- Future of Broadband in India Future of Broadband in India The mother of all announcements proceeded the last parliamentary session. That was the day when...
- Dire Straits for BSNL Broadband This post is self explainatory What all I had been crowing about all these months. The “target” for “millions of...
- Spreading Broadband in India Spreading Broadband in India I came across an advertisement in a computer related industry magazine. Those people wish to get...
- Reliance Broadband: Open Letter to Mr Anil Ambani An open letter to Mr Anil which I wrote in recently. I think it’s appropriate to share here. Dear Sir,...
- BSNL Broadband Hoopla There are hosts of complex interrelated issues that need to be enumerated for the launch of broadband services by BSNL.I...
- Reliance Broadband When would Reliance jump in the broadband arena? Noone knows for sure. Plus its been debated ad nauseum in the...
[...] Hence, it would be difficult to quantify the need for speeds. People would put it to diverse uses as they deem it to be fit. Unless of course the content chokes the access. This only means that telcos would have to scale up bandwidth manifold. Which I don’t see as “happening”. [...]