<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandblog.in/627-wireless/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandblog.in/627-wireless</link>
	<description>Ring Side view of Indian Telecom Circus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadband in India: Reaction to post on NDTV &#171; Broadband Blog</title>
		<link>http://broadbandblog.in/627-wireless/comment-page-1#comment-296985</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadband in India: Reaction to post on NDTV &#171; Broadband Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandblog.in/627/wireless/#comment-296985</guid>
		<description>[...] I have written earlier on why Wired Broadband should be the option rather than wireless (here,here, and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have written earlier on why Wired Broadband should be the option rather than wireless (here,here, and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek</title>
		<link>http://broadbandblog.in/627-wireless/comment-page-1#comment-70397</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandblog.in/627/wireless/#comment-70397</guid>
		<description>Jagan, I offered my opinion and you yours. Though, lets not make this a fanboy contest war here. That &quot;my browser is better than yours&quot; kind of a deal. I mentioned clearly about the innovations. Even though, I remain an open source evangelist, Firefox (or Mozilla) sucks in it&#039;s implementation by being bloated. It almost looks like an Opera clone with all it&#039;s so called &quot;features&quot; being added via the &quot;extensions&quot;. Each one to his own though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jagan, I offered my opinion and you yours. Though, lets not make this a fanboy contest war here. That &#8220;my browser is better than yours&#8221; kind of a deal. I mentioned clearly about the innovations. Even though, I remain an open source evangelist, Firefox (or Mozilla) sucks in it&#8217;s implementation by being bloated. It almost looks like an Opera clone with all it&#8217;s so called &#8220;features&#8221; being added via the &#8220;extensions&#8221;. Each one to his own though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek</title>
		<link>http://broadbandblog.in/627-wireless/comment-page-1#comment-296618</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandblog.in/627/wireless/#comment-296618</guid>
		<description>Jagan, I offered my opinion and you yours. Though, lets not make this a fanboy contest war here. That &quot;my browser is better than yours&quot; kind of a deal. I mentioned clearly about the innovations. Even though, I remain an open source evangelist, Firefox (or Mozilla) sucks in it&#039;s implementation by being bloated. It almost looks like an Opera clone with all it&#039;s so called &quot;features&quot; being added via the &quot;extensions&quot;. Each one to his own though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jagan, I offered my opinion and you yours. Though, lets not make this a fanboy contest war here. That &#8220;my browser is better than yours&#8221; kind of a deal. I mentioned clearly about the innovations. Even though, I remain an open source evangelist, Firefox (or Mozilla) sucks in it&#8217;s implementation by being bloated. It almost looks like an Opera clone with all it&#8217;s so called &#8220;features&#8221; being added via the &#8220;extensions&#8221;. Each one to his own though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagan</title>
		<link>http://broadbandblog.in/627-wireless/comment-page-1#comment-70393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandblog.in/627/wireless/#comment-70393</guid>
		<description>Care to elaborate on why Mozilla sucks as a browser? It&#039;s fast, works across most websites and has the most amazing extensions available. Opera is a good browser, but for most people, it will remain a second browser at best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care to elaborate on why Mozilla sucks as a browser? It&#8217;s fast, works across most websites and has the most amazing extensions available. Opera is a good browser, but for most people, it will remain a second browser at best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagan</title>
		<link>http://broadbandblog.in/627-wireless/comment-page-1#comment-296617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandblog.in/627/wireless/#comment-296617</guid>
		<description>Care to elaborate on why Mozilla sucks as a browser? It&#039;s fast, works across most websites and has the most amazing extensions available. Opera is a good browser, but for most people, it will remain a second browser at best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care to elaborate on why Mozilla sucks as a browser? It&#8217;s fast, works across most websites and has the most amazing extensions available. Opera is a good browser, but for most people, it will remain a second browser at best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: broadbandblog.in @ 2012-05-23 19:55:39 -->
