The following is the text of the email sent and an edited version appeared in Business Standard on 06/11/2009.
Dear Sir,
This refers to Shyam Ponnapa’s write up on BS dated 05/110/2009 (Managing Spectrum Efficiently).
The big question. Why do we need 3G? Why not focus on the land line business alone for broadband access? Or better still. Community Wifi?
The arguments for doing away with this are many. Community Wifi is deemed to be a security risk but then countries like Singapore have implemented this on a large scale nationwide. The mobile phones required to access 3G invariably have Wifi access too. Unless, the telecom companies are expecting surefire hits like Apple iPhones or flood of other smart phones to access the Internet, it is not happening.
We don’t have accurate numbers about the likes of Reliance and Tata who are offering their 3G access. If initial reports are to be believed, they are plagued by “line of sight” hassles, ‘network congestion’ and lackluster customer support. To top it all, it has the access limitations which means that broadband access, even on the 3G spectrum would be capped for very obvious reasons.
We have enough bandwidth in the country but as anyone would testify, we have problems in implementing the “last mile access”; having a contentious set of issues like 3G is not going to solve the persistent problem of “last mile access” because no one is interested in sinking money for a long term.
We can have a fair idea from the existing companies like Airtel or Vodafone who charge exorbitant rates under the present implementation of “mobile internet”. What is the guarantee that they would lower down the prices once they pay fancy sticker prices in 3G auction?
3G, would most likely be used for carrying more voice traffic because none of the players harbours any disillusionment about the “mobile broadband” across the length and breadth of the country.
The market for value added services is locked up within the “walled garden” of the existing players; it is unlikely that 3G access would “revolutionize” the content.
This pretty much sums up what I have always alluded here and my opposition to 3G remains.
This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
Related posts:
- New players and ideas Department of Telecom (may your tribe decrease!) has recently awarded the spectrum to new players. They did that with aplomb...
- Future Trends in Telecom in India Future Trends in Telecom in India Over the past few months that I have been contributing to this tech portal,...
- Apple- Mobile phones? Now this is one of the hottest topics across the Internet. Of course, I wanted to comment on the same....
- Year 2006 forecast It’s difficult to forecast anything for the new year. Specially at the rate at which the technology is changing. In...
- Apple iPhone .flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment { } .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; } .flickr-caption { font-size:...
- India Broadband and Telecom Update There is a lot of noise in the media without anything major happening on ground. BSNL has finally started its...
- Indian Telecom: Spectrum war hots up Airtel upped the salvo by offering 2000+ crores for the spectrum. This rattled the Tatas (who own perhaps the worst...
- Mobile phone mania. Moiles were initially started off as a lifestyle statement; with over priced calls and then the whole mobile landscape changed...
- Affordable Telecom in India Affordable Telecom in India The most important aspect of affordable telecom is a cost effective mobile handset. Surprisingly I did...
- Smaller Telecom Operators in India Smaller Telecom Operators in India In the complex telecom muddle, there are a few independent operators that have stood the...
