As per the media reports, the mobile number portability is delayed because BSNL and MTNL were not ready for it.
In any case, I am toying with the idea of filing a second RTI application but my attention is fixated on academics and it would be impossible to keep a track of the same. In case anyone among the readers feels motivated enough, please let me know through feedback on drapuri (at) gmail (dot) com and I would happily guide the way out including help with drafting of the application.
Trust me, you’d feel very happy with the process to move the sarkari machinery in motion to respond to you. The idea is to inundate these idiots with RTI applications and make them realize that their own regulations are being flouted.
The context of the RTI application should include pointed questions towards mobile number portability, relevant orders to the same, procedure outlined, whether the telecom operators are filing compliance reports, copies of those reports, penalties to be imposed on operators who delay, cause of delays and what action has TRAI taken to ensure compliance with the erring operators.
This is important because TRAI’s own rules are being flouted, mobile number portability would have benefited the incumbent operators and the biggest losers would have been the Government Operators. With delays in capacity expansion, BSNL is already loosing market share. But then, who cares?
The entry of private operators hasn’t really shaken up the market. With perhaps per second billing as the highlight of the year, there is nothing else to speak of. In any case, it would not result in “drastic savings” because of the complex interconnect and termination charges. We don’t really know how we are being scammed.
A further highlight of the proposed RTI application can be the break up of the call rates and the scope for reduction of the same. The operators are dependent on voice revenues to a large extent; data and VAS accounts for a growing percentage of revenues, but as per media reports, not good enough to impact the bottomline in any significant manner. Therefore, the scramble is on to protect the cash cow; at any cost because the customers can be MILKED.
The big question really is: How much profit is really profitable?
This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
Related posts:
- We need mobile number portability I was reading this comment on the Broadband Blog and realized that we have enough players in the market. At...
- Mobile Gaming Rashmi Bansal has an interestiing take on Mobile Gaming on her blog. As usual, there is over statement of the...
- TRAI cracks the whip In a press release, TRAI insists that quality of service parameters need to be adhered to. Oh well, it’s an...
- TRAI: Whither Access Deficit? Access deficit was a tax imposed on the mobile consumers for subsidising BSNL to provide rural telephony. Most of the...
- TRAI:Breaking it’s mould What has happened to TRAI? All of a sudden, it seems to have jumped from an IQ of deliquency to...
- Vodafone India: Congenital idiots!! It has been a long long wait for the whole issue to be addressed. As mentioned in the earlier posts,...
- Vodafone India: Fight against the suckers They have not been able to provide me the connectivity I deserve. Their complaint resolution sucks. I have emailed them...
- Airtel Mobile: 100 million customers? The magic figures are conjured out of no where. No one has done a head count nor audited their records....
- Airtel Broadband: Suckers Airtel recently reduced the price for 512kbps; I got a call from an excited “executive” who “informed” about the price...
- Indian Telecom- Mobile developments I have been looking at the evolution of mobile phones from a close angle. First and foremost is the fact...
