This is a follow up post to the earlier write up.
Whilst it’s difficult to update it on a regular basis, you can follow up on the news. Interestingly, there has been an editorial about the same in Business Standard and this has been followed up with my letter to editor today. Basically I have recapitulated the contents of the blog mentioned yesterday which is repetition but minus any comments on RIM and it’s crapware. The letter has been reproduced here in it’s entirety.
Dear Sir,
I am surprised that there is an opposition to ban on Blackberry. The only gaffe in the entire episode and consequent drama is because this issue has been made public and received widespread publicity which is not warranted.
Agreed that privacy is important for an individual but the moment one connects to the grid, a person can easily be identifiable. The web browsers routinely collect cookies from sites which tracks user behavior and those systems which are infected with trojans or viruses reveal more incriminating details. Worse still. A brand new activated number is leaked out by telecom companies to various telemarketers for unsolicited calls despite Do Not Call lists and registration and SMS spam has assumed alarming proportions. Why the editorials can’t raise that issue as a matter of concern? Whither privacy?
Most of the countries where RIM operates has an explicit understanding that whatever data flows through Blackberries would be available for scrutiny. National security is paramount and if that is the overriding concern for “snooping on public”, so be it. Cellular calls can easily be tracked with equipment available off the shelf and indeed it was the cover story on an English weekly few weeks back. Similarly, a vital telecom infrastructure should be available for scrutiny because of immediate concerns of remote monitoring by foreign powers and the ability to remotely switch it off during national emergencies. We ought to have full control over whatever equipment is installed including the proprietary source codes. It is up to equipment manufacturer to do business with this country based on their needs. If they feel that our demands are too rigorous, they are welcome not to step in this country.
We live in supercharged times where such naiveté is rewarded by loss of life and property. Post Sept 11 attacks, US has passed Patriot Act which gives them unprecedented access to call logs and the like. I would be surprised if RIM or Blackberries are not monitored in US or even Canada where RIM is in active denial mode to the contrary.
This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
Related posts:
- India Broadband and Telecom Update There is a lot of noise in the media without anything major happening on ground. BSNL has finally started its...
- Blackberry India: a security threat? I cam across these write ups in media (1, 2, 3) which says that Blackberrys are a security threat. If...
- RIM Blackberry: Much ado about nothing Blackberry has been under fire literally. Admittedly it has been popular because of it’s push email facility but atrocious overpriced...
- Update By this time, it is apparent. The Tata’s seemed to have “read this blog” and decided to exit from it’s...
- Update on Apple Mobiles Apple Insider reports the imminent launch of Apple iTunes enabled mobile. I had earlier mentioned about the same as to...
- Update on BSNL Broadband Service Update on BSNL Broadband Service BSNL has finally rolled on in the broadband in select cities. However, a closer look...
- A small update Somehow, the emerging VoIP skipped out of my mind. The next year is definitely going to be big for the...
- Mobiles in India: A rip off! I have the numbers finally. Something that I have been alleging but could never get the right numbers because it...
- Paid for Media Exposure in India Paid for Media Exposure in India Is there a paid media exposure? I had alluded to the same in one...
- Broadband penetration in India broadband penetration in India What could be done to increase the broadband penetration in India? Arguably, this is not an...
