Finally,another link from Rajesh Jain- on mobile TV.
This echoes my own thoughts as to what I have mentioned in the earlier posts (1,2,3)
Though mobile TV does, for the moment, suffer from technical limitations such as long buffering times and choppy streams, Sprint, Verizon, and Cingular have determined that the medium is now good enough to begin earning money for carriers. Most basic services — which offer channels such as ABC News or E! — cost roughly $10 to $15 per month, with pay-per-view clips sold for up to $4 and à la carte channels for upwards of $4 each.
This is expensive by Indian standards.
A powerful enough reason why Mobile TV isn’t “happening”.
And the carriers are right. Mobile TV is exciting. But for me, the daily thrill of playing around with phones that serve as teeny TVs began to fade just around the moment I crossed the threshold to my apartment after work. That’s because at home, I have absolute control over what I see and how I see it. I have a Hewlett-Packard Media Center PC, a buggy but powerful machine that, in addition to serving as an ordinary computer, utterly blurs the distinction between streaming Web video and broadcast television. It allows me to watch, record, and organize video content from any source — the Web, broadcast TV, or DVDs. And because I also use the Windows Media Center Extender, I can have all that content streamed directly to my television.
Plus, the biggest disadvantge is that the mobile phone companies would dictate the programmes that you can watch.
Still, it’s too early to say as to how things would shape up.