Broadband Blog

Ring Side view of Indian Telecom Circus

Verizon’s LG VL600 USB LTE Modem Reviewed – Nice Speeds, Though Software Disappoints

Tags: , , , , ,


Last December Verizon launched their new LTE network, offering speeds anywhere from 5-20 Mbps to approximately 100 million users in 38 markets and roughly 60 airports. The initial launch included USB modems only — smartphone LTE service isn’t intended to drop until mid-summer. Verizon offers two USB modems, the dual mode /LTE LG VL600, and the travel-ready -capable Pantech UML290. Ars Technica has decided to give the LG VL600 a review, calling it “awfully fat” for a USB dongle while arguing the included software is a dud — but finding that speeds consistently impress. At those speeds, Ars notes they were very aware of the service caps:

Still, it’s hard to resist Verizon’s offering once you experience those speeds. During our testing, it was easy to forget that we were even using a connection, which speaks well of the data speeds, but isn’t quite so friendly to your download cap. As we mentioned earlier, a 5GB limit is a lot easier to respect when you’re getting slower speeds (like, say, when using Verizon’s network).

But at something around 20Mbps, you may find yourself going over that limit sooner than later. 10GB is probably a more comfortable limit for anyone who will be using the dongle for more than a few days a month, but then you’re also forking over $80 every month and don’t get to share the connection with other devices (unless you do so manually via your computer’s sharing settings).

The VL600 is $100 after a new 2 year contract and online $50 rebate.
read comment(s)


Tags: , , , , , ,

Aircel Wifi: Is something being done?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Demo showing seamless handover of a voice call...

Image via Wikipedia

I have always supported Community Wifi Access. This is because mobile broadband is useless for . access is a passe’.

Aircel has not responded to my queries and neither I am interested to follow them up. I had earlier emailed them about the promotion of apps. It isn’t clear how they were developed and what platform is supported.

But I was genuinely surprised to see their advertisements in main stream media for access through smart platforms (phones/laptops/tablets). Although the adverts did allude to a “rosy picture”; it is not entirely clear as to how they propose to pull it off with no identified “backend”. More so, it is important that needs to be scaled up to residential areas so that they enough traction to call the shots as well as have a positive spin off on their recently launched 3G options.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tata Telecom: Sinking ship

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ratan got a lot of flak for his association with the corporate PR specialist; per se the association is not illegal but motivated agendas are. He’s the head of who had earned a good corporate reputation over the years with the tag line, “We also make Steel”.

Over the past few years, they entered into Telecom; bought over for their and international telephony needs, misread the market, entered into and then forked into with two competing brands- and Tata DoCoMo. While Virgin had it’s CDMA avatar (now in ), Docomo is spearheading it’s foray.

In all the hoopla, it has carved a niche for itself by being an idiot and super idiot at the same time. There is no parallel in the world (not to my knowledge) where a same company would fight for the same customer pool. Leave aside it’s mobile business (which is opaque as far as the revenues are concerned), it’s broadband strategy is in tatters.

Hence when Forbes India came up with the cover story on Tata’s Telecom strategy, I was eagerly awaiting the web version because this crap is not worth the paper it is printed on (and hence not worth the money spent on this tattered crap rag). I was proved right when the “” in question hammed on the same issue time and again; perhaps without even realizing that one needs to have an in-depth understanding of the sector. The title says a lot about the “telecom strategy” but sadly these morons on Forbes have restricted themselves to “mobile segment” alone.

I refuse to account for the sector changes or even track the people involved in decision making. This is not my specialty or my interest. My only interest is to get a better deal as a customer; see it through the prism of my own understanding and spout out my “wisdom”.

The whole article talks about the sectoral changes due to or charges being traded in “business publications” elsewhere. It does not make even one fucking cursory mention about it’s strategy elsewhere; where it has met it’s waterloo and has been drubbed by customers square- Broadband.

I don’t understand; really don’t understand as to why these cant scale up the platform. They have ; they make tonnes in carriage fees (as per the reports) and burning huge amount of cash in customer acquisition. A proper (and a portal) with content cross ported from DTH (if you take care of the license issues- what the fuck is their army of lawyers doing?) and you have a sure fire recipe for success.

Of course, this has to come with a balance of right targets and marketing. Last mile access alone is a major issue but not for the class B and class C cities and towns where they could have become the default broadband service providers. But because it needs funds, long term vision and skill of execution, Tatas are found wanting.

Forbes disappoints me. Not that I had expected a stellar reporting from them but at least SOME bloody semblance of balance in the story. It only points towards the idea bankruptcy, lack of sectoral understanding and oodles of stupidity.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

© 2009 Broadband Blog. All Rights Reserved.

This blog is powered by the Wordpress platform and beach rentals.